
Google Research has analysed a decade of traffic data to prove that instances of hard braking recorded by connected cars predict accident hotspots far better than actual police crash reports. Using anonymised data gathered from Android Auto, researchers established a direct link between the frequency of severe deceleration on specific road stretches and the likelihood of future collisions. Instead of waiting years for accidents to accumulate before classifying a junction or highway ramp as dangerous, authorities can now use this smartphone data to identify and fix risky roads immediately.

Traffic safety evaluation currently relies on historical crash statistics. While a police report is solid proof of a dangerous road, it is a lagging indicator. An accident must happen, often resulting in injuries or property damage, before a location gets flagged. On many local and arterial roads, it can take years to register enough collisions to justify safety upgrades. Inconsistent reporting standards across different jurisdictions make this process even slower.
Google proposes using hard braking events as a proactive safety measure. The company defines this event as any instance where a vehicle decelerates at a rate exceeding 3 metres per second squared. A drop in speed this rapid typically indicates an evasive manoeuvre, such as a driver swerving to avoid an obstacle, reacting to a sudden lane change, or navigating a poorly designed blind corner. Because these incidents happen frequently and do not require police intervention, they offer a massive volume of usable safety data.

To test this theory, the research team compared ten years of public crash statistics from California and Virginia alongside hard braking data collected via Android Auto. The difference in data volume was massive. The number of road segments showing hard braking activity was 18 times greater than the segments with officially reported crashes.
Crash data is notoriously sparse, but smartphone sensors provide a continuous, high density stream of information. This data stream factors in exposure variables like traffic volume and segment length, as well as infrastructure elements like slopes, ramps, and lane reductions. The resulting analysis proved that roads with high frequencies of emergency braking consistently exhibited higher crash rates across all road types.
The most practical application of this research lies in identifying high risk infrastructure before a major pileup occurs. Google highlighted a specific freeway merge segment connecting Highway 101 and Highway 880 in California. Over a ten year period, this specific ramp averaged one crash every six weeks.
When researchers looked at the connected vehicle data for this exact location, the hard braking signal was 70 times higher than the average freeway. The segment ranked in the top one percent of all roads for evasive manoeuvres. The smartphone data successfully flagged this extreme outlier immediately, completely bypassing the need for a decade of collision reports to statistically confirm the danger.
This validated metric turns raw sensor data into a highly practical tool for traffic management. Google is now integrating these datasets into its Maps Platform for road authorities. Highway agencies and city planners will have access to fresh, aggregated data covering vast road networks.

By pinpointing where drivers are forced to slam on their brakes, authorities can implement targeted engineering solutions. This could mean adjusting traffic signal timings, improving street signage, or completely redesigning dangerous merge lanes. For motorists dealing with chaotic daily commutes and poorly marked intersections, this shift from reactive reporting to predictive road maintenance could drastically reduce the physical risks of driving.